- November 2022
- PRODUCTS & INITIATIVES
- GREATER CHINA
- PRIVATE EQUITY PANORAMA
- MACAU REPORT
- VIETNAM REPORT
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- SINGAPORE REPORT
- SEARCH DIRECTORY
- ROAD WARRIOR (HYBRID WORK)
- November 2022 E-MAG
- GOING PLACES
The mission creep of private equity
Stephan Schäli, CIO of Swiss private asset manager Partners Group, offers a highly suggestive summary of a house view regarding private and public markets. The gist is that the composition of public equity markets is shifting away from the broader “real” economy towards more speculative and opportunistic growth stocks.
He cites statistics that 85% of IPOs in 1990 were for companies that had reported positive earnings, a figure which by 2020 had dropped to just 20%. As the link between the equity markets and the economy frayed with this change of focus, he says private markets are increasingly becoming more “traditional”, offering diversified exposure across industry sectors, and potentially to high-growth economic segments.
This perspective is concerning in two ways. One is that “traditional” is also increasingly descriptive of private equity’s performance. Leaving aside the controversy over the measurement of this performance and how much investors can actually hope to receive from their private equity commitments, there are plenty of indices of the current and near-term performance. Preqin’s recent report on the future of alternatives indicates that the asset class’s returns are in decline, offering less and less outperformance when compared to public markets.
The mission creep of many private equity houses into private debt, infrastructure and real estate, each being served up as the new outperformer, is an alarming sign that institutions getting less from the old private asset will simply, and unreflectively, buy up new private assets, with equally vague expectations of final returns.
This factors into the broader concern about trends in public markets – the retreat from fiduciary accountability in pursuit of yield.
Private equity was historically marketed as a high-risk asset, anything but traditional, especially when compared to the more predictable, transparent and regulated public markets. If investors like pension funds are now so yield-hungry that they are chasing higher-risk propositions in the public markets too, they are obviously putting the money entrusted to them at risk. And why would pension funds, whose fiduciary obligations are stricter than most, do that? The answer is often to make up for underfunding, the very thing that’s also driving them into private markets.
Pension underfunding is probably ultimately a political problem, to be solved by political means. It is not solvable by jacking up performance.
The public markets have historically been the arena of accountability. Private equity is identified by one thing above all – it’s private, therefore far less accountable. Pensioners should not be happy to see their funds moving into less and less accountable asset classes, while also taking a less and less responsible position in mainstream assets.
- Malaysia’s EPF, in spite of investment income decline, is “cautiously optimistic”
- Investors fret about recession but Fed may engineer soft landing, Thai market players say
- Binance enters Japan with purchase of Sakura Exchange Bitcoin
- Hong Kong’s Exchange Fund investments spew red ink, “substantial” 2022 loss seen
- Philippine lawmakers introduce bill for 250 billion peso sovereign wealth fund
- Malaysia’s PNB CEO Jalil Rasheed resigns
- Malaysia suspends some short selling as coronavirus batters markets
- Thai fund industry records 132.2 billion baht inflows, mostly into China, global equities
- Hong Kong’s PCCW Solutions wins eMPF tender
- Singapore’s Temasek helps raise US$430 million for Bahamas-based crypto firm FTX
- Analysis: What made Temasek can Keppel deal?
- Taiwan’s BLF plans $2.3 billion global climate change equities tender
- Singapore fund management assets driven by alternatives in 2020, MAS says
- China’s CIC puts greater emphasis on ESG
- Japan’s GPIF seeks legal firm to advise on alternatives